Key takeaways
Weekly competitor and account research took four hours. I wrote the steps down first, then let Claude, n8n and Make do the reading. It took one.
What happened
In April 2026 I took over the growth team at DemandNexus, a B2B demand-generation agency. Every week someone had to read what competitors had published and check what our accounts were doing. It took four hours.
Before I touched a tool, I wrote the steps down: which sources, what to look for, what the brief should look like. Then Claude, n8n and Make did the reading. I checked every brief and struck any line with no source. The job fell to one hour, and the three hours went back into client work.
The first version went wrong in a plain way. The brief listed everything the tool found. It ran so long that nobody read it, and a brief nobody reads saves no time. I cut it to one page, with what changed since last week at the top. Next time I’d set the one-page limit on day one.
Try it
Where it goes wrong
This week, do steps 1 and 5. Pick the job, write the steps down and time how long it takes today.
The full story is in the DemandNexus case study. Next in the track: your first automation. This lesson is part of Marketing with AI.
Sources
Frequently asked questions
Do I need n8n or Make to start?
No. Start with the written steps and Claude on its own. Automate the trigger only once the brief reads well. I used Claude, n8n and Make together.
How do I know the brief is right?
Check every line against its source and strike anything with no source. If a line can't be traced, it doesn't go to the team.
Three-minute lesson on this Build a weekly research brief Marketing course, advanced. Free, no sign-up.